Whilst it is generally recognized that innovation is important and gains shareholder value, what is less well understood is how to become more innovative. Innovation audits review current practices enabling the consultant to advise on alternative and additional measures and techniques that companies can adopt to improve and maximize their innovation capabilities.
The precedent paragraph succinctly encapsulates the ratione for innovation audits. They are designed to assist companies in understanding their current innovation practices, and how these might be improved upon or added to. Indeed, the audit may illuminate some practices which are actually hindering innovation, and these need to be reduced or stopped. Why? All companies interested in growth will be looking at how they can be innovative and it is increasingly, and widely recognized that innovation capability is one of the key determinants of long-run profitability and survival. Companies will, therefore, all be wishing to improve their processes to maximize their innovation capabilities and maximize opportunities for growth.
All organizational systems should support innovation. Corporate executives need a means of auditing their firm's innovation capability so that they can get a sense for the overall performance of their innovation process and where it may be deficient. The innovation audit is a proven method to improve innovation. It examines key indicators, determinants strengths and weaknesses and identifies ways of improving innovation through the organization.
The subsidiary report tells you what is working well in terms of culture, processes, communication and actions. It also analyzes what is inhibiting innovation.
The outcome of the audit should be a clear identification of issues and the obstacles of innovation. It enables you to significantly improve the culture and process of innovation within your business. It should also lead to higher levels of motivation throughout the organization, resulting in a more innovative, and entrepreneurial organization that welcomes and initiates change. All of which leads to an ability to implement fresh ideas to generate revenue or reduce cost.
A summary of the benefits of an innovation audit is as follows:
· It enhances the company's innovation capability;
· It identifies opportunities for increasing innovation;
· It clarifies where the organization needs to focus to maximize innovation success;
· It embeds innovation in the company's processes;
· It can build on individuals' creativity to be innovative;
· It can identify and control the barriers that stifle creativity and innovation;
· It fosters innovation in the organization's culture; and
· It can align the organization in common purpose and action.
Examples of questions, which can be asked, include:
· Innovation strategy
o Is there an innovation strategy?
o Does the innovation strategy support the corporate strategy?
o Is the innovation strategy known and understood through the organization?
· Idea generation
o Are ideas readily canvassed from staff?
o Are ideas submitted from different levels and departments?
o How many ideas were submitted over the past twelve months?
o Are financial and scoring techniques used to select projects?
o Are there appropriate mechanisms in place to assess potential projects?
o Are decisions made quickly?
o Is there an appropriate project review mechanism?
o Is there an appropriate mechanism for capturing learning from projects?
o Are there links between the appropriate departments?
o Does the organization's culture support innovation?
o Do individuals' have innovation goals and goals?
o Are there rewards and recognition for innovation efforts.
An example of an audit:
Audits can be connected on different levels. One level is an on-line survey completed by client companies and their staff. Such a survey could be based on the following five areas:
- Innovation strategy- why, what, where, when;
- Idea generation – creativity;
- Selection – which;
- Implementation – making it happen;
- Organization – how.
The responses are then analyzed, and a report submitted to the client setting out conclusions and recommendations.
The second level supports the on-line survey, referred to above, as a starting point. Once this has been completed and analyzed, face-to-face interviews would have been scheduled with selected staff. This gives a more in-depth fact base from which to draw conclusions, insights and recommendations.
Other Examples of Audit Methodologies
The Innovation Diamond considers the following four headings:
- Strategy for product innovation and technology (the need for new products to tie into corporate goals);
- Resources: Commitment and Portfolio Management (the portfolio needs to have maximum return on investment, a balance of projects – risk, markets, technologies, etc, and a strong link between efforts and strategy);
- Idea-to-launch System: Stage-Gate®;
- Climate, culture, teams and leadership.
An alternative is to adopt the McKinsey 7S framework based on:
- Strategy – which considers questions around Strategic Plans, innovation and change;
- Structure – this considers questions of roles and responsibilities;
- Systems – this looks at the processes which governs the organizations' actions;
- Skills – these reviews the skills within the organization as well as identifies what gaps exist within the skill set;
- Staff – this consultants personnel and team aspects;
- Styles – this Touches on organizational culture and tools adopted;
- Shared Values - this also touches on culture, vision, rewards and attitude of employees.
A third technique is to consider the following five broad headings:
- Strategy and leadership;
- Organization and culture;
- Planning and selection;
- Structure and presentation;
- Communication and cooperation.
A further approach is to liken the innovation to a fruit tree that produces a superb crop (outcomes). Such a crop results from how it is fed (via its roots) and what supports the tree's environment. Within the organization, the roots are its people, groups, teams, leadership and innovation processes. The environment is its culture. Outcomes consider the organization's profitability in incremental and breakthrough initiatives, how it develops its ideas, manages teams, decision-making and learning.
Another approach combines quantitative and quantitative data sources to provide the fullest picture of the firm's innovation strengths and weaknesses. It uses interviews, assessment of financial data, review of relevant project documentation and bespoke market research to assess an overall innovation performance and identify factors that might contribute to poor outcomes. This approach looks at the organization's innovation performance to date, the capacity of the organization against relevant activities (strategy, creativity, selection, development, exploitation and resources). It reviews leadership and top management's attitude to innovation.
All of these different methodologies follow a broadly similar tack They ask questions to understand the processes, attitudes and ethos of the organization and its members. They use surveys and interviews in a structured format, under broadly similar headings.
To conclude, innovation audits are an examination of current innovation practices. Such an understanding allows the consultant to advise on alternative and additional measures and techniques which companies can adopt to increase and maximize their innovation capabilities.